Barun Kumar Singh @ Barun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58296 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-505 Year-2023 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya ====================================================== Barun Kumar Singh @ Barun Kumar S/o- Paras Nath Singh R/O VillageGarh Kedali, P.S.- Hunterganj, District- Chatra, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Abdul Shakoor Khan S/O Md. Badruddin Khan, R/O Moh. White House Compound, P.S. - Rampur, Dist. - Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2 :
Mr. Uma Kant Mishra, Advocate Mr. Shakib Ayaz, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-12-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant/opposite party no. 2.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with MMCH P.S. Case No. 505 of 2023, dated 30.11.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 341, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned A.P.P. for the State at the outset submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carry punishment of seven years and less.
4. The said submission of the learned A.P.P. for the State is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58296 of 2024(3) dt.16-12-2024 2/2 the petitioner and the informant.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner based on instruction submits that investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing but then petitioner has not been given the notice under Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C., on which learned A.P.P. submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar).
6. In view of the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024.
7. The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of three weeks from today with a web copy of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024 and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the direction contained in the said order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T