← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16211/2011dismissed

Sushil Sahni And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-08-03Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.16211 of 2011 (2) dt.03-08-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16211 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Sushil Sahni S/O Sri Asheshwar Sahni Resident Of Village Kataiya, P.S.- Benipatti, Distt,- Madhubani

2. Benipatti Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd, Kataiya Benipatti Madhubani Through Its Secretary Of Adhoc Committee Of The Benipatti Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd. Kataiya Benipatti .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Co-Operative Deptt., Bihar, Patna New Secretariate, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

2. The Registrar, Co-Operative Society Bihar, Patna

3. The Bihar State Election Authorities, Bihar, Patna

4. The Dist Magistrate Cum Dist.Election Officer, Madhubani

5. The Dist, Co-Operative Officer, Madhubani

6. The Circle Officer, Bisfy Cum Election Officer Benipatti Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd. Kataiya, Benipatti

7. The Co-Operative Extension Officer Head Quarter, Madhubani

8. Shambhu Mukhiya S/O Sri Bindeshwar Mukhiya Resident Of Village Kataiya , P.S.- Benipatti, Dist.- Madhubani

9. Kala Devi W/O Tej Narayan Sahni R/O Village - Kataiya, Dist.- Madhubani

10. Shiv Kumar Mukhiya S/O Ramjee Mukhiya Resident Of Village Kushmmaul. P.S. Arer, Distt.- Madhubani

11. Pitamber Mukhiya S/O Rambriksha Mukhiya Resident Of VillageKataiya , P.S.- Benipatti, Distt.- Madhubani

12. Tej Narayan Sahni S/O Late Basudeo Sahani Resident Of VillageKataiya, P.S.- Benipatti, Distt.- Madhubani .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Kumar, AC to GA 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 03-08-2015 Mr. Ranjit Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that this writ application has become infructuous.

As a result, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U