Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20567/2018rejected

Lal Singh @ Jai Kishor Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-04-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20567 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -248 Year- 2010 Thana -SUPAUL District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Lal Singh @ Jai Kishor Singh S/o late Vishun Dev Singh, R/o VillageBaruari, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rama Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 248 of 2010, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 323, 302, 307, 435 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and several others is of assaulting the father of the informant causing his death. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioner and in fact petitioner has no role to play in the occurrence rather some villagers assaulted the deceased under the impression that the deceased had committed any offence. It has further been submitted that informant has filed compromise petition, in which he has stated that the petitioner was not involved in the occurrence and he

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20567 of 2018 (2) dt.26-04-2018 2/2 named the petitioner under wrong impression.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the case is of the year 2010 and petitioner has not surrendered uptil now.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the conduct of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner if so desire may surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T