Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51599/2019bail granted

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-01Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51599 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2019 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== SUMIT KUMAR @ SUMIT THAKUR, aged about 20 years, Male, Son of Binod Thakur, Resident of Mohalla - Gautam Nagar Bikramganj, P.S.- Bikramganj, Distt - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Om Prakash Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore(App.100) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of one stolen motorcycle from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 20.05.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51599 of 2019(3) dt.01-10-2019 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 243/2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T