Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21970 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2017 Thana -RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Nitish Kumar Son of Sri Kanchan Kumar Singh Resident of VillageRajgir Chakper, P.S.- Rajgir, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kuamr Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S.Case No.62 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code & Section 66 I.T. Act Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is that the police raided in the house of the petitioner and seized several A.T.M. Cards, Debit Cards and other documents and it is alleged that under the conspiracy with the other co-accused persons, he had fraudulently has drawn money from the different banks but there is nothing to show that he had drawn money from banks.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has clean
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21970 of 2017 (3) dt.11-05-2017 2/2 antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and now remained in custody for about two months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Judge-XIII-cumAddl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S.Case No.62 of 2017.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a close family members having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U