Chote Lal Singh @ Chote Lal Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61915 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-749 Year-2020 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Chote Lal Singh @ Chote Lal Kushwaha S/O Late Baccha Singh Resident of Village- Chitauna, P.S- Kateya, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sumit Kumar Srivastva, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The prayer for bail of the petitioner has earlier been rejected vide order dated 10.01.2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 84378 of 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 12.09.2025, the petitioner was directed to file a supplementary affidavit bringing on record substantial proof to show that he is not absconding in any of the cases pending against him, which are twenty two in number. The said affidavit has not been filed till date. Once again, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks further time to file the same, submitting that he has not received any instructions from the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61915 of 2025(4) dt.19-12-2025 2/2
4. This matter has been pending since September, 2025 and despite sufficient opportunity having been granted to the petitioner to file the said supplementary affidavit, the same has not been filed till date.
5. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that keeping the present application pending any further would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 749 of 2020, pending before the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, is hereby rejected.
6. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail as and when he is in a position to apprise this Court about the status of the pending cases against him. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U T