Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26881/2018rejected

Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-04Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26881 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-492 Year-2017 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajit Kumar, Son of Bippin Prasad, Resident of Vilage- Fatuha, P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amrendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No.492 of 2017 (G.R. No.7904 of 2017), registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The vehicle of the informant bearing registration no. BR 05G-6817 having been taken away by unknown miscreants. The informant has suspected the present petitioner to be involved in the commission of theft as having been stated that six days earlier the petitioner along with two unknown persons came for purchasing his vehicle. So, he has strong suspicion that the petitioner was involved in lifting of his vehicle.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26881 of 2018(2) dt.04-05-2018 2/2 From the order-sheet, it appears that the petitioner was granted bail by the Police.

In such view of the matter, the present bail application is not maintainable. Accordingly, the same is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below within three weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the Court below shall verify whether the petitioner during the period of P/R bond has misused the privilege of bail or not, if there is no misuse of privilege of bail, it is excepted that the Court below will pass the order in the said background.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T