Kalim @ Kalimuddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65354 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2019 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== KALIM @ KALIMUDDIN S/o Sadalli @ Sadruli Resident of VillageBishahariya Akarthappa, P.s.- Bhargama, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 324, 354(B), 307, 447, 448, 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.09.2021, is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that his father was going to Karbala fair when he saw a large mob coming towards him and the mob was raining arrow. It is further alleged that his father tried to hide but the mob reached there and Md. Yaseen ordered to kill

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65354 of 2021(2) dt.11-04-2022 2/2 whereupon Mangan shot arrow upon the father of the informant causing injury on the left side of his rib cage, further Abid injured Masudan by arrow. Further, it is alleged that the father of the informant died during the course of treatment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, he is not alleged to be the assailant rather is alleged to be a member of the mob without any specific overt act alleged against him. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, is a person with clean antecedent, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and is not in the category of assailant, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 224 of 2019.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T