Md. Irshad Ansari @ Irshad Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22203 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -699 Year- 2016 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Md. Irshad Ansari @ Irshad Ansari S/o Late Md. Idris Ansari Resident of Village- Hasanpur, Ward No. 16, P.S. Raniganj, District Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Manish Kumar 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 699 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing theft of Rs. 6500/- of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. Moreover, petitioner has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 30.12.2016 and has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and the period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22203 of 2017 (4) dt.18-07-2017 2/2 learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Araria, in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 699 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

It is also made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of such offence, in future, his bail bonds will be cancelled.

.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T