Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Gop v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65911 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-362 Year-2020 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna ====================================================== SUNIL KUMAR YADAV @ SUNIL GOP S/o Late Krishna Yadav Resident of Village Bahri Begampur, Mandaipar P.S. Bypass, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rudra Deo For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s) as pointed out by the office, it any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Bypass P.S. Case No. 362 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 272, 273, 290, 354(D), 420, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, section 3/4 of Bihar Bengal Gambling Act and section 37 (b) (c) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2018.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65911 of 2021(2) dt.17-12-2021 2/2 of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.) Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T