Md. Abdullah @ Munna v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24414 of 2017 (2) dt.28-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24414 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -496 Year- 2015 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Md. Abdullah @ Munna, S/o Late Mohiuddin, Resident of Village - Chans Nala, Indra Chowk, P.S. - Pathaldih, Dist - Dhanbad (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Farza Khatun, W/o Md. Abdullah @ Munna, D/o Md. Sufi R/o Mohalla - Gewal Bigha near Juma Masjid, P.O. Gaya, P.S. - Rampur, Dist - Gaya. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate. For the BSFC Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Complaint Case No. 496 of 2015, registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is of torturing the complainantopposite party no. 2 by her husband and in-laws due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry and also driven out from her matrimonial house.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, who is the husband of complainant-opposite party no.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24414 of 2017 (2) dt.28-06-2017 2, has falsely been implicated in this case due to misunderstanding. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2017.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 496 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T