Chandrika Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12305 of 2024 ====================================================== Chandrika Kumari Daughter of Shiv Shankar Yadav, Wife of Shree Bal Ram Kumar Yadav Resident of Village-Thadhi, P.O. Chichodhva, P.S. Andhramath, District-Madhubani At Present Resident of Village-Mahthaur Goth P.S. Andhramath, District-Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Secretary Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, Child Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, 3.
The Commissioner, Darbhanga, Division Darbhanga 4.
The District Magistrate Madhubani.
5.
The District Programme Officer Madhubani.
6.
The Sub Divisional Officer Phulparas Madhubani. 7.
The Child Development Project Officer Laukahi, Madhubani. 8.
The Block Development Officer Laukahi, Madhubani. 9.
The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Mahadev Math, Laukahi, Madhubani. 10.
The Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Mahadev Math Laukahi, Madhubani. 11.
Smt. Subhadra Kumari Son of Shree Surendra Kumar Suman Resident of Village-Mahthhauroth, P.S. Andhramath District-Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr.Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-08-2024 Heard Mr. Gagandeo Yadav along with Mr. Ravi Prakash and Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, learned GA 7 for the Respondents/State.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance
Patna High Court CWJC No.12305 of 2024(2) dt.19-08-2024 2/2 with law, in the light of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka & Others Vs. Ameerbi & Ors., reported in (2007) 11 SCC 681.
3. Considering the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the relief(s) as prayed for in the present writ petition.
4. With the above observation/direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U