M/S Om Sai Indian Seva v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15698 of 2019 ====================================================== M/s Om Sai Indian Seva, a proprietorship firm, represented by its proprietor Rakesh Roshan aged about 43 years son of Vijeshwar Prasad, resident of Ashok Nagar, Road No.1, Kankarbagh, P.S. Kankarbagh,Patna-800020, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 2.

Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 3.

The Chief Engineer (South) Building Construction Department, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna 4.

Engineer-in-Chief, Building Construction Department, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna 5.

Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department, Bhawan Anchal, Gaya, Kedarnath Market, Dist.Gaya 6.

Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Bhawan Pramandal, Gaya, Gandhi Maidan Near Museum, Dist.Gaya 7.

Departmental Technical Bid Committee Headed by Principal Secretary, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav (AAG 11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 15-12-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "That this writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner abovenamed for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, to quash the decision dated 16.7.2019 as contained in Memo

Patna High Court CWJC No.15698 of 2019 dt.15-12-2022 2/2 No.(Bhavan) 1064(3) of the departmental Technical Bid Committee, which has directed for forfeiture of security deposit deposited by the petitioner for withdrawing from the tender and wishing to take back his earnest money which decision is arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable." Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted.

Present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/Sujit AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 16.12.2022 Transmission Date