Ruplal Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23116 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -293 Year- 2015 Thana -SUGAULI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Ruplal Rai Son of Sri Gagandeo Rai, Resident of Village- Roshanpur Sapahan, P.S.- Supauli, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 323, 307, 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier petitioner had moved before this Court and his prayer for bail was rejected vide order dated 29032017 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 54454 of 2016 with an observation that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against the petitioner is that he caused simple injury on the informant. Charge has been framed in this case which will appear from Annexure-2 to this petition. He has remained in custody for about eight months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23116 of 2017 (2) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that earlier observation has been made by this Court as well as he has remained in custody for about eight months, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 12th Addl. Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 202 of 2017 arising out of Sugauli P.S. Case no. 293 of 2015 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T