Guddu Rai @ Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53264 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2024 Thana- JURAWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Guddu Rai @ Guddu Kumar S/o Late Trigun Rai Resident Of VillageRaghopur Purvi, Ps- Jurawanpur, Dist- Vaishali 2.
Bittu Rai @ Bittu Kumar S/o Trihut Rai Resident Of Village- Raghopur Purvi, Ps- Jurawanpur, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shivjee Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115, 126(2), 109, 303(2), 351, 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 07.09.2024 at 7.30 A.M. while he was sitting at his door with his three sons when the accused persons came and started pressurizing to give their share of land. On protest, Bhim Rai gave orders to kill, on which Bablu Rai
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53264 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/3 assaulted the informant by an iron rod causing injury on head, ear and left hand. Thereafter, the son of the informant Chandrashekhar came to rescue him, when Arjun assaulted him by an Axe causing injury on head and Suresh Rai assaulted him by an iron rod. Thereafter, all the accused assaulted them.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of dispute relating to land, an altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is also submitted that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioners and the entire family members have been implicated. It is further submitted that specific allegation of assaulting the informant and his son is against Bablu, Arjun and Suresh.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53264 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 3/3 Chief Judicial Magistrate-14, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Jurawanpur P. S. Case No.160 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T