Deo Narayan Sudhanshu And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25258 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Deo Narayan Sudhanshu Son Of Sri Basudeo Prasad Yadav Resident Of Village Bhargama, P.S. Bheja, District Madhubani
2. Arbind Kumar Lalan Son Of Sri Jai Krishan Yadav Resident Of Village Bhargama, P.S. Bheja, District Madhubani
3. Uma Kant Ram Son Of Late Khushi Lal Ram Resident Of Village Bhargama, P.S. Bheja, District Madhubani
4. Mina Kumari Wife Of Sri Manoj Kumar Resident Of Village Bhargama, P.S. Bheja, District Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Null Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna
4. The District Magistrate, Madhubani
5. The District Education Officer, Madhubani
6. The Block Development Officer, Madhepur, P.S. Madhepur, District Madhubani
7. The Block Education Officer, Madhepur, P.S. Madhepur, District- Madhubani
8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Bhargama, P.O. Bhargama, P.S. Madhepur, District Madhubani
9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Bhargama, P.O. Bhargama, P.S. Madhepur, District Madhubani ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, GP 26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 26-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. In view of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.
Patna High Court CWJC No.25258 of 2013 dt.26-07-2018 2/2
3. Permission is granted.
4. In case the petitioners file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is required to decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioners were pursuing the writ petition for the same relief before this Court.
5. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 27.07.2018 Transmission Date