← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16736/2013dismissed

Manju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-01Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 16736 of 2013 =========================================================== Manju Kumari Wife Of Prakash Kumar Mandal Resident Of Mohalla- Tulsibari, Rajpur Maliya, Ward No. 9, Police Station And District- Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. Director, I.C.D.S., Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. District Magistrate, Madhepura

4. District Programme Officer, Madhepura

5. Child Development Project Officer, Madhepura

6. Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa

7. Kanchan Kumari Wife Of Banshidhar Baheri Resident Of Village- Malia Police Station- Madhepura, District- Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Sunil Kr Mandal, SC III with Mr Arjun Prasad, AC to SC III =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

2 The writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon the respondents for making selection of the petitioner on the post of Angan Bari Sevika at Angan Bari Centre, Tulsibari Rajpur Malia in the district of Madhepura in light of the directions made by the District Magistrate and the Commissioner.

3 Neither the order of the District Magistrate nor the order of the Commissioner directs that the petitioner has to be

Patna High Court CWJC No.16736 of 2013 dt.01-08-2018 2/2 appointed subsequent to the removal of respondent No 7. The petitioner has no enforceable claim or indefeasible right to claim that she should be the only person to be selected at the Angan Bari Centre in question is not established.

4 No case is made out for interference from the materials available on record. The writ petition is devoid of any merit and is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 03.08.2018 Transmission Date NA