Rajesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64851 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2021 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

RAJESH PASWAN Son of Late Jugeshwar Paswan Resident of Village - Ramzanpur, Police Station - Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura. 2.

Rahul Paswan Son of Late Jugeshwar Paswan Resident of Village - Ramzanpur, Police Station - Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 385, 387, 447, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, these petitioners on the point of pistol forcibly ploughed about two acres of land and also demanded Rangdari from the informant to leave the land. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. As a matter of fact petitioners paid Rs. 14 lacs to the informant for execution of sale deed but informant neither

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64851 of 2021(3) dt.25-08-2022 2/2 executed the sale deed no returned the said money. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioners are named in the FIR and there is specific allegation against them that they forcible took the possession of land of the informant. The sale deed and rent receipts for land in question were in the name of mother of informant and ample material was collected during the course of investigation to show the complicity of the petitioners in the aforesaid crime.

Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T