Patna High CourtMJC/665/2015disposed

Bidyawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-23Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.665 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15705 of 2012 ====================================================== Bidyawati Devi Wife of Late Bijendar Ram, Daughter of Julan Ram, Resident of Village Siktaul Gadhiya, P.S. Chautarwa, P.O. Harpur, District West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sri Ram Bhujhawn Chaudhary, the Director of Education (Secondary) Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. Sri Lokesh Kumar Singh, Chairman District Compassionate Committee through Collector Bettiah Collectorate, West Champaran.

4. Sri Lokesh Kumar Singh, the District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.

5. Sri Triloki Nath, the Deputy Collector, District Compassionate Committee, Bettiah.

6. Sri Gorakh Prasad, the District Education Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.

7. Kiran Jha, Functioned the District Superintendent of Education Bettiah, West Champaran.

8. Sri Nagendra Sah, Panchayat Sachiv cum Panchayat Sikshak Niyojan Ekai, Gram Panchayat Raj, Patilar, Bagaha 1, West Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha No.-2 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In view of the order dated 4th March 2015 whereby the case of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that she is not an intermediate but having a qualification of 8th class, cannot be accommodated as Panchayat Teacher.

Patna High Court MJC No.665 of 2015 (2) dt.23-09-2015 2/2 In the contempt proceeding, this Court cannot make any comment on the order. However, the liberty is given to the petitioner, if so advised, may take a legal recourse as available in law.

Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U