Patna High CourtCWJC/13658/2013dismissed

Md. Majhrul Bari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-28Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13658 of 2013 =========================================================== Md. Majhrul Bari, Son of Jakiruddin, Secretary Suleman Samaj Kalyan Sansthan Chattarbhog, P.O. Bisnupur, P.S. Amour, District Purnia .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

3. The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea

4. The District Magistrate, District Purnea

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, District Rural Development Agency, Purnea

6. The Block Development Officer, Baisa, District Purnea .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Raghwanand, GA 11 Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, AC to GA 11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-08-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to make payment of the bill of the petitioner amounting to Rs. 4,49,420/-.

2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite call being repeated after an interval.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents invites reference to paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit, according to which the admitted amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- has been paid to the petitioner vide cheque no. 169655 dated 10.12.2013 drawn from U.B.G.B. Bank, Purnea and the remaining amount of Rs. 49,420/- is said to have been

Patna High Court CWJC No.13658 of 2013 dt.28-08-2018 2/2 claimed in excess as found upon verification of the bills of the petitioner and the liability in this regard has been denied.

4. Having regard to the nature of the grievance of the petitioner and the stand of the respondents in the counter affidavit, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The statement made in the counter affidavit with regard to excess claim of Rs. 49,420/- by the petitioner has not been controverted and no rejoinder thereto has been filed.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 04.09.2018 Transmission Date N.A.