← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53632/2025bail granted

Akhilesh Paswan @ Gora Paswan @ Chintu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-07Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53632 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-356 Year-2024 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Akhilesh Paswan @ Gora Paswan @ Chintu Paswan S/O Jaidun Paswan R/O Village- Pindri, P.S- Huntrganj, Dist.- Chatrhar (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 356/2024 dated 02.07.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 309(4) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants ridden on a motorcycle are alleged to have snatched Rs. 1, 01,740/- from the informant on the point of pistol.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53632 of 2025(2) dt.07-11-2025 2/3 implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in this case during the course of investigation. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 18.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 87080/2024. The petitioner has seven criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sherghatti, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 356/2024, with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53632 of 2025(2) dt.07-11-2025 3/3 date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T