Satendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12412 of 2024 ====================================================== Satendra Kumar Son of Late Ramdev Vishwakarma, House no 385B/76 Gewal Bigha, Near- Munni Masjid, Police Station- Rampur, District Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Gaya.

3.

The District Accounts Officer, Gaya.

4.

The District and Sessions Judge, Civil Court, Gaya. 5.

The Judge In-charge, Civil Court, Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, GP-20 For the Respondent Nos. 4&5 :

Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Advocate Ms. Kanupriya, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-08-2024 Heard Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Satyabir Bharti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 4 and 5 and Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, learned GP-20 appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to file a detailed representation before the authority concerned for redressal of his grievance, as prayed for in the present writ petition, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in case of Amresh Kumar Sinha & Ors. v. The State of Bihar & Ors. (SLP (C) Nos. 8219-8226 of 2016) and

Patna High Court CWJC No.12412 of 2024(2) dt.20-08-2024 2/2 later on clarified by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kamlanand Thakur vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (C.W.J.C. No. 18727 of 2017).

3. Considering the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the concerned authority is required to call for service particulars of the petitioner and verify, as to whether, he has suffered any disciplinary action, pursuant to the penalty order and decide the grievance of the petitioner expeditiously, in light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Amresh Kumar Sinha (Supra) and the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kamlanand Thakur (Supra).

4. In case, the authority concerned makes delay in redressal of grievance of the petitioner, the petitioner can take appropriate legal action against him.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U