Son Ram Soren @ Sona Ram Soren And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27494 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAKAI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Son Ram Soren @ Sona Ram Soren, Son of Jethu @ Jhetha Soren

2. Muni Hembram, Wife of Sona Ram Soren Both Resident of VillageFatepur, Police Station-Chakai, District-Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners are of demand of dowry and causing the death of the deceased.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are father in law, mother in law of the deceased and has nothing to do with the death of the deceased and no specific allegation has been attributed to them.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27494 of 2018 (2) dt.10-05-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate - III, Jamui, in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T