← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51288/2019disposed

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Rai @ Surendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51288 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2019 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== SURENDRA YADAV @ SURENDRA RAI @ SURENDRA PRASAD Son of Late Suraj Rai Resident of Village - Mohadipur, P.S. - Chiraiya, DistrictEast Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Asha Devi Wife of Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Rai @ Surendra Prasad, D/O - Harendra Rai Resident of Village - Mohadipur, P.S.- Chiraiya, District- East Champaran. Presently Resident of Village - Jhajhara, P.S. - Jitna, District- East Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 498-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner happens to be husband of the informant and allegation against him of subjecting the informant to cruelty and torture. It is further alleged that on 03.02.2019, while the informant was going to sleep, all the accused persons came and sprinkled K. oil on her body and petitioner tried to set her on fire. Later on accused persons ousted her from the house. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the marriage was solemnized 10-11 years ago and no such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51288 of 2019(2) dt.17-08-2019 2/2 allegation has ever been made. In fact the informant herself does not want to live with the petitioner and due to which, she has filed the present false case. Further submission is that the petitioner is still ready to keep the informant -wife with full honour and dignity.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to surrender before the court below by 26.08.2019, on which, the court below shall release him on provisional bail and will issue notice to informant and try to find, if there is chance of settlement of dispute between the parties and considering the same, he will pass an appropriate order either confirming or cancelling the provisional bail of the petitioner. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T