Rekha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54585 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2019 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== REKHA DEVI W/o Bhola Manjhi Resident of Village- Rupaspur Mushahari, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyadeo Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 305 of 2019 (arising out of Spl. Case No. 5982 of 2019) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) and 37(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 15 litres of country made liquor from the house of petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 07.07.2019 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54585 of 2019(3) dt.01-10-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 305 of 2019 (arising out of Spl. Case No. 5982 of 2019) subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T