Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57489 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2024 Thana- BHIMPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Yadav, S/O Ashok Yadav @ Amrendra Yadav R/O Village- Amha, Ward No.- 01, P.S- Supaul (Laukaha O.P.), Distt.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kuldeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a car.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized car and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Amlesh Kumar in police custody, which does not have any evidentiary value.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57489 of 2024(2) dt.13-08-2024 2/2 application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-IV-cum- Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.1, Supaul in connection with Bhimpur P. S. Case No.50 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T