← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25094/2016bail granted

Amlendra Shekhar Thakur @ Amir Thakur @ Amlendu Shekhar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-03Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25094 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -242 Year- 2015 Thana -BIRPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Amlendra Shekhar Thakur @ Amir Thakur @ Amlendu Shekhar Thakur, Son of Krishnadeo Thakur, resident of Bisanpur Choudhary, Police StationBalur Bazar, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhurilata, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 242 of 2015, registered under Sections 341, 323, 384 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that on 28.12.2015 after finishing the work informant had gone to Balua market and in course of returning from the market to Gammon India Company situated in Bishanpur Choudhary Camp, two persons came on motorcycle and started to abuse and took his mobile No. 8405804086 and informant was left near the camp and both miscreants returned from there. The Informant detailed the physic of the culprits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25094 of 2016 (3) dt.03-08-2016 2/2 would appear from the F.I.R. that both miscreants after taking mobile of the informant left him near camp of Gammon India Company at Bishanpur. The informant did not disclose the name of the mobile set. After three months of the occurrence, one mobile set is said to be recovered from the possession of the petitioner by the Police, which is said to be theft mobile of the informant. While the informant has claimed to identify the culprits, but petitioner has not been put on T.I.P for identification. The petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 22.03.2016.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Birpur (Supaul) in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 242 of 2015.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) manish/- U T