← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65397/2021bail granted

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu Chaudhary @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-25Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 65397 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2018 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== CHHOTU KUMAR @ CHHOTU CHAUDHARY @ VIKASH KUMAR Son of Parmeshwar Chaudhary Resident of Village - Jandhaul, P.s.- Sirdala, Distt.- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 413, 44 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Recovery is of 36 liters of Mahua wine.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the alleged recovery has been made from the joint house of the petitioner. He further submits that the alleged recovery has no concern with the petitioner as the said portion from which recovery has been made is of the share of cousin of the petitioner. He further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 65397 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 2/3 submits that the police after investigation has submitted chargesheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 26.07.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries seven more cases other than the present one.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 397 of 2018 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 65397 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 3/3 bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T