Madhir Bind v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25166 of 2016 (4) dt.09-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25166 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2016 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Madhir Bind S/o Shiv Lakhan @ Budhdeo Bind Resident of village - Ishebigha, P.S. Jehanabad, ( Karauna O.P. ), District - Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Binod Kumar-III, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.22 of 2016 registered for an offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 302 and 504/34 of the IPC. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged by the informant that on 13.01.2016 at 8.10 P.M. some altercation took place between his brother and petitioner in respect of doing irrigation and Batai of field of Bihari Singh and Durga Singh of village-Daudpur and further alleged that due to altercation petitioner came at his house situated in Ishe Bind and called other accused persons and all of them assaulted his brother and the informant along with other family members came by foot in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25166 of 2016 (4) dt.09-08-2016 running condition and found his brother dead and thereafter informing the police.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2016. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence. Merely on suspicion, the petitioner has been named in the case.
On behalf of the State and counsel for the Informant, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.22 of 2016.
(Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T