Sujeet Kumar @ Dosha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53815 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar @ Dosha, S/o Shankar Chaudhary, R/o Village-Maksudpur, P.S.- Asthawan, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Maruth Nath Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2.The accused/petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nalanda Cyber P.S. Case No.55 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'B.N.S.') as well as Sections 61(2), 66-C and 66-D of the Information and Technology Act.

3.The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and is in custody since 23.05.2025.

4. Allegation against petitioner is to commit cyber fraud and thus by to cheat innocent persons.

5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53815 of 2025(3) dt.17-11-2025 2/3 the petitioner that there is no private complaint in this matter and merely on the basis of suspicion, the petitioner has been implicated with present case. It is pointed out that mobile number in issue was not even recovered from conscious physical possession of this petitioner and also the seizure list is not supported by independent witness rather by police personnel. While concluding argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is already completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted and, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. The petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

6. Learned APP opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as recovery of alleged mobile phone not appears to be made from conscious physical possession of this petitioner rather from an open place like roof, coupled with the fact that investigation of this case is already completed, where petitioner remains in custody since 23.05.2025, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53815 of 2025(3) dt.17-11-2025 3/3 directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Nalanda in connection with Nalanda Cyber P.S. Case No.55 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'CrPC')/under Section 480(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (for short 'BNSS') with further conditions:- (i) That petitioner shall not indulge in similar nature of offence till the conclusion of trial, failing which the State shall be at liberty to move before the Trial Court itself for the cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Sanjeet/- U T