Sunil v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24189 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -180 Year- 2016 Thana -BAUSI District- PURNIA ====================================================== Sunil son of Sri Siyaram, resident of village- Kumavar, P.S. Basrehar, District- Itawa (UP).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Special Excise Case N.720 of 2017 arising out of Baisi P.S.Case No.180 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 & 273 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier prayer of the petitioner had been rejected, vide order dated 10.02.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.2932 of 2017. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that now he has remained in custody for the period of six months, as such he may be granted bail as he is ready to abide by any condition imposed upon him.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the observation and considering the period of custody and also the petitioner is cleaner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24189 of 2017 (2) dt.17-05-2017 2/2 of the Truck, as such let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Purnea in connection with Special Excise Case NO.720 of 2017 arising out of Baisi P.S.Case No.180 of 2016. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U