Ashok Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3073 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14208 of 2017 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Sinha Son of Late Kameshwar Prasad Sinha, Resident of village - Rampur Chaoram, Police Station Rampur Chaoram, District - Arwal at present residing at Murarpur Kali Asthan, Lakhan Mahuri Gali, P.S. - Kotwali, Post- G.P.O., Gaya, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Sri Amir Subhani, The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri Bonodanand Jha, The Director, mass Education, Education Deptt. Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Sri Subrat Kumar Sen, District Magistrate, Saran at Chhapra. 5.
Sri Shyam Babu Ram, The District Mass Education Officer, Begusarai. 6.
Sri Jay Prakash Narain, The Deputy Collector (Establishment) Saran at Chhapra.
7.
Sri Raghvendra Kumar, The Block Development officer, Block Lahladpur, District - Chhapra.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Upendra Kumar Chaubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Abhyanjali, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-12-2024
1. The learned counsel for the opposite parties seeks to file a supplementary show cause, copy whereof has already been filed online. Let the same be kept on record.
2. The learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted by referring to the supplementary show cause filed in the present case that the arrears of salary for the suspension period has already stood paid to the petitioner, which is not
Patna High Court MJC No.3073 of 2019(4) dt.20-12-2024 2/2 controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, he submits that certain amount, outstanding on the head of differential amount of Earned Leave and on the head of monetary benefits, emanating out of grant of the benefits of ACP, are pending for payment, hence the petitioner be granted liberty to approach the respondents for redressal of his subsisting grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.
3. The petition stands disposed off.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U