Santosh Kumar @ Vijay Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24767 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2016 Thana -RAMGARHWA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Santosh Kumar @ Vijay Prasad, son of Chhotelal Prasad, resident of village Navkathwa, P.S. Ramgarhwa, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 21-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 03.04.2016 in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 21 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Excise Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and nothing was in fact recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner nor from the alleged shop belonging to the father of the petitioner Chhotelal Prasad.

4. Having regard to the nature of accusations and the gravity of offence relating to the alleged occurrence having transpired after the recent amendment to the Bihar Excise Act, this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24767 of 2016 (3) dt.21-07-2016 Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. The bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U T