Rama Nand Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28545 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -360 Year- 2017 Thana -BHORE District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================
1. Rama Nand Yadav, son of late Gopalchand Yadav,
2. Kailash Gupta, son of late Gaya Gupta, both are resident of villageMathuli, P.S. Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhramveer, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Pd., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 23-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Bhorey P.S. Case No.360 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 420, 467, 468, 471, 465, 469, 323, 504, 379, 120-B Indian Penal Code.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that there is land dispute between the informant and accused persons as mentioned in the Complaint Petition. Petitioners are alleged to be identifier and witness on the sale deed as mentioned in para 4 of the Complaint Petition.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28545 of 2018 (2) dt.23-05-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No.360 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:
(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bonds and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T