Patna High CourtCWJC/17728/2010dismissed

Dr.Sadanand Jha v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-08-31Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17728 of 2010 ====================================================== Dr. Sadanand Jha S/O Late Tulanand Jha, R/O Village, P.O. & P.S.- Lakhnaur, Distt.- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary Ministry Of Human Resources Development, Govt. Of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi

2. The Deputy Secretary (Languages) (Sanskrit Language) Ministry Of Human Rsources Development, Govt. Of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi

3. The Under Secretary Ministry of Human Resources Development, Govt. Of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi

4. The Rastriya Sanskrit Sansthan, New Delhi, Through Its Registrar Office At 56-57, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, New Delhi

5. The Vice Chancellor Rastriya Sanskrit Sansthan, New Delhi, Office At 56-57, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, New Delhi

6. The Registrar Rastriya Sanskrit Sansthan, New Delhi, Office At 56-57, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, New Delhi

7. The Deputy Director (Academic) Rastriya Sanskrit Sansthan, New Delhi, Office At 56-57, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, New Delhi

8. The Managing Committee Jagadish Narayan Brahmacharyashram Adarsh Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Lagma (Rambhadrapur), Darbhanga Through Its Chairman, Distt.- Darbhanga

9. The Chairman, Managing Committee Jagadish Narayan Brahmacharyashram Adarsh Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Lagma (Rambhadrapur), Distt.- Darbhanga

10. The Principal Jagadish Narayan Brahmacharyashram Adarsh Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Lagma (Rambhadrapur), Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarendra Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G. Ms. Punam Kumari Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-08-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application as the same has become infructuous.

Permission is accorded.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17728 of 2010 (6) dt.31-08-2017 2/2 The writ application stands dismissed as being infructuous.

If so advised, the petitioner may approach the competent authority for any other consequential benefits if he is entitled for.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U