Saryug Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57090 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2021 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== SARYUG YADAV Son of Lalu Yadav Resident of Village - Sinduara, P.S.- Pakribarawan, District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hansraj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414 and 353/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

The informant alleges that he received information that Sanjit Kumar, Prince Kumar, Rabindra Prasad and Saryug Yadav have kept three stolen motorcycles in their hut, accordingly, reached the place of occurrence and seized two motorcycles from the hut of Bindeshwar Yadav. Further, Sanjit Kumar and Rabindra Prasad were apprehended from whom keys of the motorcycle were recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57090 of 2022(2) dt.21-11-2022 2/2 has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he came to be implicated based on secret information. It is next submitted that even the keys of the motorcycle were recovered from Sanjit Kumar and Rabindra Prasad and at the cost of repetition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 247 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T