Barun Kamat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61116 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2024 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Barun Kamat Son of Bhogi Kamat Resident of Village - Navtoli Bakuar, P.S. - Rajnagar, District - Madhubani 2.

Bhogi Kamat Son of Thakur Kamat Resident of Village - Navtoli Bakuar, P.S. - Rajnagar, District - Madhubani 3.

Pandai Devi Wife of Bhogi Kamat Resident of Village - Navtoli Bakuar, P.S. - Rajnagar, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2024, registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354(B), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, daughter of the informant was brutally assaulted by her husband and in-laws by means of brick and iron rod due to which she sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61116 of 2024(2) dt.04-10-2024 2/2 that the allegations levelled against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner no. 1 is husband, petitioner no. 2 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is mother-in-law of the victim. It is further submitted that as per injury report mentioned in the impugned order, it appears that one injury is found on the forehead of the victim which does not corroborate the allegation of prosecution rather there is no repeated blow found on the body of the person. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T