Patna High CourtMJC/640/2015dismissed

Ram Bilash Prasad @ Ram Belash Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-24Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha,Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.640 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13878 of 2007 =========================================================== Ram Bilash Prasad @ Ram Belash Prasad, Son of Late Khublal Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Najirganj, P.S. - Ara Town , District- Bhojpur (Ara). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, its Chief Secretary. Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Dharmendra Singh Gangwar, The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reform Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. Sri Narmdeshwar Lal, The Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

4. Sri Pankaj Kumar Pal, the District Magistrate cum Collector, Bhojpur, at Ara.

5. Sri Anil Kumar Singh, The Sub Divisional, Officer, Sadar, Bhojpur, At Ara. .... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S.Raza Ahmad, A.A.G. IX Mr. Vishwambhar Prasad, A.C. to A.A.G. IX.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-07-2015 In view of the cause shown by Collector, Bhojpur at Arrah, Opposite Party No. 4 asserting that the name of the petitioner from the panel stood deleted in terms of the instructions contained in Memo No. 12 Headquarters dated 18.06.1995, copy whereof was served on the petitioner on 06.07.1995, the order under contempt could not have been passed, as such fact was stated in the counter affidavit filed in the writ case, may be giving an

Patna High Court MJC No.640 of 2015 dt.24-07-2015 2/2 incorrect date of removal of the petitioner.

I see substance in the show-cause and I am not inclined to proceed any further with the contempt application, which is disposed of. Petitioner, if so advised, may assail the action of the respondents in accordance with law.

(V.N. Sinha, J) P.K.P.