Chandan Kumar Gupta And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21790 of 2012 ======================================================
1. Chandan Kumar Gupta, S/o Sri Kashi Nath Prasad Gupta, Resident of Anand Nagar Colony, At & P.O. & P.S.- Bikramganj, Dist.- Rohtas.
2. Ganesh Kumar, S/o Late Dharmendra Kumar Gupta, Resident of Near Ballay Roy, Sultanpur Danapur Cantt, Patna.
3. Ajya Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Rameshwar Singh, Resident of VillageKoshdihara, P.O.- Sainth, Distt.- Kaimur.
4. Niraj Kumar, S/O Sri Om Prakash Shandilya, Resident of Ashok Nagar, Road No.- 07, Kankarbagh, Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
2. Joint Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
3. Deputy Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
4. Presiding Officer, (Prashasi Padadhikari), State Health Committee, (Rajya Swatha Samiti), Bihar at Pariwar Kalyan Bhawan Sheikhpura, Patna- 14.
5. Executive Director State Health Committee (Rajya Swastha Samitti) Bihar at Pariwar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna- 14. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, GP-8. For the Respondent-Soci: Mr. K.K. Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 14-09-2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. Harish Kumar, learned Government Pleader No.8 for the State and Mr. K.K. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the State Health Society are present and inform that the petitioners pray for quashing of the advertisements which were published in the year 2008 and 2009.
In my opinion, the writ petition seeking to question the
Patna High Court CWJC No.21790 of 2012 (2) dt.14-09-2018 advertisements published in the year 2008 and 2009 vide Annexures 13 and 14 respectively after a lapse of 4 years was grossly belated and the passage of 10 years when this matter is taken up, the issue has been rendered academic. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. . (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/Anjula U