Ranjan Prasad @ Ranjan Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32080 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -946 Year- 2015 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ====================================================== Ranjan Prasad @ Ranjan Kumar Son of late Mohan Pandit Resident of Mohalla- Golghar Chouraha Gali, P.S. Buddha Colony, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Binod Kumar Son of Sri Krishna Prasad R/o Village +P.O.+P.S. Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad Pin Code- 804407 .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jehanabad Complaint Case No. 946 of 2015 lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of N.I. Act After some argument, it has been submitted at the Bar that the parties have compromise the matter and according to them petitioner has to pay Rs.2.5 lakh to the complainant in two instalment and there was allegation as per complaint petition that petitioner has taken Rs.5.14 lakh but not repaid the same, whereas petitioners claims that only 1.38 lakh was due. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP and learned counsel for the informant.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32080 of 2018 (3) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 Having heard the parties and in view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order along with a Bank Draft of Rs.1.25,000/- payable to the complainant and in that event learned court below will release the petitioner on provisional bail for a period of one month and within the said period petitioner has to deposit rest of the amount payable to the complainant, otherwise his bail bond shall be cancelled. It is made clear that once the total amount is deposited his bail bond shall be confirmed. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that complainant has assured that he will not press the case in the court below.
With the above observation, this application is disposed of.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U