← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65589/2021allowed

Ganga Prasad Yadav @ Ganga Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65589 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2021 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Ganga Prasad Yadav @ Ganga Yadav S/o Late Bhikhari Yadav Resident of Jogbani Tikulia Basti, Ward No.10, P.S.- Jogbani, District- Araria. 2.

Dipendra Yadav S/o Ganga Prasad Yadav Resident of Jogbani Tikulia, Basti, Ward No.10, P.S.- Jogbani, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No.119 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner No.1, Ganga Prasad Yadav is said to have assaulted the informant by means of iron rod on his head and Petitioner No.2, Dipendra Yadav is said to have assaulted the informant by means of iron rod causing fracture injury in his left hand. It is also alleged that petitioner no.1 assaulted the father of the informant by means of sharp edged weapon. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65589 of 2021(3) dt.22-08-2022 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries. The learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Taking into consideration the facts that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-Vth, Araria in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No.119 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T