Patna High CourtCWJC/5655/2013disposed

Dr. Nagendra Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-25Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5655 of 2013 ====================================================== Dr. Nagendra Jha Son Of Late Baidyanath Jha Resident Of Village Sarisab, P.S. Benipatti, District Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Its The Principal Secretary Education Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Benipatti, District Madhubani

4. The District Education Officer, Madhubani

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) District Madhubani

6. The Secretary Pandit Dukh Mochan Chaudhary Padma Bahan S. Raja College, Chanpura Basaitha P.S. Basaitha District Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bhashkar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

In the present case, the dispute is with regard to date of appointment. As per the claim of the petitioner, he was appointed on 5.12.1985 and on the same day he joined the post as a Lecturer but, he has wrongly been shown to have joined the post of 7.12.1986 which made him junior to Jitendra Narayan Jha who has been made professor-in-charge. As the petitioner is the senior most person in the college, he should have been given that post. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.5655 of 2013 (3) dt.25-02-2016 Tribunal has already been constituted for resolving the dispute with respect to teachers of private colleges in view of Notification dated 20.12.2013.

In that view of the matter, the petitioner should approach the Tribunal for redressal of his grievance. With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U