← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15637/2019disposed

Sneh Lata Upadhyay v. The Union Of India

2019-08-01Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15637 of 2019 ====================================================== Sneh Lata Upadhyay daughter of Sri Shesh Mani Upadhyay resident of Village- Mehnuali, P.S. Shohratgarh, District- Sidharth Nagar (U.P) at present residing at Flat No. 553, Lal Bahadur Shastri Nagar, Near Government Girls High School, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Secretary, Higher Education, Human Resources Department, New Delhi.

2.

The Central University of South Bihar, SH- 7, Gaya Panchanpur Road, P.S.- Panchanpur, District- Gaya through its Vice Chancellor. 3.

The Registrar, Central University of South Bihar, SH- 7, Gaya Panchanpur Road, P.S.- Panchanpur, District- Gaya.

4.

The Dean Student Welfare, Central University of South Bihar, SH- 7, Gaya Panchanpur Road, P.S.- Panchanpur, District- Gaya. 5.

The Head of the Department, Life Science, Central University of South Bihar, SH- 7, Gaya Panchanpur Road, P.S.- Panchanpur, District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kr Sinha No.2, Advocate For the Central University :

Mr. S.D.Sanjay, A.S.G.

Ms. Priya Gupta, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Central University.

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for a direction to the respondent University to provide accommodation so that the petitioner may pursue her higher studies at Central University of South Bihar. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

Patna High Court CWJC No.15637 of 2019(2) dt.01-08-2019 2/2 the petitioner may be allowed to construct hut in the campus of the Central University so that she may pursue her studies. The Court is afraid whether this kind of relief can be granted in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The problem of accommodation may be raised by the petitioner in before appropriate authority.

The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach appropriate authority for the relief, in any view of the matter, this Court cannot grant permission to the petitioner to construct hut in the campus of the University. The writ petition is, accordingly, rejected.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uma/- U