Kamal Kishor Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30236 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-429 Year-2016 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Kamal Kishor Singh, Son of Late Prayag Singh, Resident of VillageRamghat Koshkapur, Police Station- Narpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 429 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 147,148,149,341,323,324,307,302 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has clean antecedent. In the written report, there is allegation against this petitioner of giving order to other accused to assault father of the informant, on account of which father of informant sustained injury and subsequently succumbed to injury. From the written report, it appears that petitioner is said to be order given.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30236 of 2018(3) dt.28-06-2018 2/2 allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 429 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioner and (3) if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T