Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54943/2022bail granted

Rakesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-24Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54943 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2022 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPurnia ====================================================== RAKESH KUMAR YADAV Son of Late Jagdev Yadav Resident of village - Sarsi, P.O. and P.S.- Sarsi, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Alka Kumari Wife of Rakesh Kumar Yadav Daughter of Ram Prakash Yadav, Resident at village - Manjhi Tola Amchura, P.O.- Kajha, P.S.- K Nagar, District - Purnea, At present resident of Koshi Colony, Near about Court Station, P.S.- K Nagar, District - Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-04-2023 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 218 of 2022, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. In view of the report of the Mediator and the joint affidavit filed by the petitioner and Opposite Party No.2, the petitioner has agreed to credit the entire amount of one time settlement of Rs. 20 lakhs within a period of six weeks.

4. Considering the submission made on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54943 of 2022(3) dt.24-04-2023 2/2 petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, subject to the condition that he files any receipts to show that the entire settlement amount of Rs. 20 lakhs have been paid within the aforesaid period and subject to the further condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with a further condition that if the statement made in paragraph No.3 of the present bail application with respect to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is found to be incorrect, this order will automatically will loose its force.

5. The Parties are at liberty to file appropriate legal remedy for competent Civil Court.

(Purnendu Singh, J) sanjeev/- U T