Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29155/2017dismissed

Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29155 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -174 Year- 2013 Thana -NABINAGAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Sanjay Yadav S/o Birta Yadav, resident of Village- Bel Bigha, P.S. Mali, District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No.342D of 2014/261 of 2016 arising out of Nabinagar P.S.Case No.174 of 2013, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 427, 353,124(A), 121(A) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3, 4, and 5 of Explosive and Substantive Act and Section 16, 17, 18, 19, 12 and 38 of U.P.A. Act.

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The case is under Section 302 and various Sections of the Indian Penal Code as well as various Sections of the Explosive Substance Act and U.P.A. Act.

It further appears from perusal of the record that he is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29155 of 2017 (4) dt.26-07-2017 2/2 accused in a large number of cases.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and during investigation, none of the villagers have taken name of this petitioner though it is alleged that his name was disclosed by the villagers. The petitioner is in custody since 5.1.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground of having a large number of cases against him.

Having heard both sides and from perusal of the case, it appears that since trial has commenced, in such view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conduct it on day-to-day basis and conclude it within a period of seven months. At the same time, the S.P., Aurangabad is directed to ensure attendance of the witnesses.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T