Kamini Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.771 of 2015 ====================================================== Kamini Kumari Wife of Late Ajit Kumar Singh Resident of Village + P.O.- Bhalar, District- Munger .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Education Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Education Officer, Munger.
3. The Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary), Buddh Marg, Patna through its Secretary.
4. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary) Buddh Marg, Patna.
5. The Governing Body of Lakshmi Devi Inter College, Dasrathpur, Munger through its Secretary.
6. Smt. Lakshmi Devi, Daughter of not known, President, Lakshmi Devi Inter College, Dasrathpur, Munger.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent/s :
Md. N. Hoda Khan, SC 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT 03-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner, admittedly, is an employee of a private institution, the remedy sought by her before this Court by way of filing of a writ application either with regard to order of her suspension or the consequential action by which someone being authorized to work in her place for the purpose of receiving forms and fees by the Bihar School Examination Board, cannot be gone into in this writ application in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Santosh Kumar vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.
Patna High Court CWJC No.771 of 2015 (3) dt.03-08-2015 2/2 reported in 2013(1) PLJR 269.
3. When such an observation has been made, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to enable the petitioner to pursue remedy before any other appropriate forum including the Tribunal.
4. That being so, this writ application is, accordingly, permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U