Dr. Sheo Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4705 of 2011 =========================================================== Dr. Sheo Kumar Jha, S/o Late Vishwanath Jha, R/o Dibra, P.S. Nauhatta, District - Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through Shri Anjani Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna
2. The Secretary, Shri S. Shiv Kumar, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna
3. Professor Arun Kumar, Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura
4. Dr. Genesh Prasad Yadav, Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Niraj Kumar Sinha, A.C. to PAAG-2 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-03-2017 This Court vide order dated 3rd of November, 2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15333 of 2010 and other analogous cases, stayed the letter dated 4th of May, 2010 in view of the fact that these matters are being considered in C.W.J.C. No. 10844 of 2010 and other analogous cases. The order passed was that the order passed by the Court on 3rd of November, 2010 will be subject to final orders that may be passed in the aforesaid cases.
In C.W.J.C. No. 10844 of 2010 and other analogous cases, this Court on 18th of March, 2013 has constituted One Man Committee presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.N. Jha (Retired) to determine the qualifying period of service of each and every teacher.
Patna High Court MJC No.4705 of 2011 dt.06-03-2017 2/2 Liberty was given for listing of the cases after the exercise is completed by Justice Jha.
In view of the said fact, the present Contempt Petition, which is subject to the decision of Prof. (Dr.) Krishna Mohan Prasad & Ors's. case (supra), does not survive as the matter has been referred to a Committee to decide the question of qualifying service. The Contempt Petition is, thus, disposed of. Liberty is given to the petitioner to seek recourse to his remedy after the decision of the Committee in accordance with law.
(Hemant Gupta, ACJ) P.K.P.
AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 09.03.2017 Transmission Date