Patna High CourtCWJC/2260/2015dismissed

Dr. Izhar Ahmad Khan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-06Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2260 of 2015 ====================================================== Dr. Izhar Ahmad Khan, S/o Md. Abdul Jabbar, Resident of Village Jamalpur, P.S. Jamalpur, District Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The State Project Director, Bihar Education Project Council, Rajbhasha Bhawan, Saidpur, Rajendranagar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

5. The District Education Officer, Darbhanga.

6. The District Programme Officer (Primary Education & Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, Bihar Education Project, Darbhanga.

7. The Block Education Officer, Kiratpu, Darbhanga.

8. Shri Madan Rai S/o Not known, the then District Pogramme Officer, (Primary Education & Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, Bihar Education Project), Darbhanga, presently posted as District Programme Officer (Establishment, Bihar Education Project), Muzaffarpur.

9. Md. Yunus, S/o Md. Suleman, Resident of Village Belwa, P.S. Aadapur, District West Champaran, Bihar, P.S. Aadapur, District West Champaran, Bihar, the then Block Education Officer, Kiratpur, Darbhanga.

10. Shri Mahesh Prasad Singh, S/o not known, Executive Engineer, Bihar Education Project, Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, Advocate For the S t a t e : Ms. Geeta Kumari, G.P.-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 06-02-2015 The petitioner is free to approach the authority explaining his status and position with regard to Annexure 2, who will thereafter decide the dispute. No interference is warranted under the circumstances under which such a direction had to be issued, because ultimately public money is required to be accounted for, by the people who have taken the responsibility.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2260 of 2015 (2) dt.06-02-2015 2/2 The writ application is dismissed with the liberty as above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) PNM U