Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54788 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2022 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== PRAMOD YADAV @ PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV SON OF CHHATHU YADAV R/O VILLAGE- BHAGWATIPUR, YADAV TOLA, P.S.- PANDAUL, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 234 litres liquor from a WagonR car. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, it is further submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54788 of 2022(2) dt.18-10-2022 2/2 the alleged vehicle and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Chhattu Yadav in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 109 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No. 888 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T